Benchmark illustrates fashions’ capabilities like coding and reasoning. ’s end result displays he mannequin’s efficiency over varied domains out there on knowledge on agentic coding, math, reasoning, and gear use.
| Benchmark | Claude 4 Opus | Claude 4 Sonnet | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional |
| HumanEval (Code Gen) | Not Accessible | Not Accessible | 74.8% | 75.6% |
| GPQA (Graduate Reasoning) | 83.3% | 83.8% | 83.3% | 83.0% |
| MMLU (World Data) | 88.8% | 86.5% | 88.7% | 88.6% |
| AIME 2025 (Math) | 90.0% | 85.0% | 88.9% | 83.0% |
| SWE-bench (Agentic Coding) | 72.5% | 72.7% | 69.1% | 63.2% |
| TAU-bench (Instrument Use) | 81.4% | 80.5% | 70.4% | Not Accessible |
| Terminal-bench (Coding) | 43.2% | 35.5% | 30.2% | 25.3% |
| MMMU (Visible Reasoning) | 76.5% | 74.4% | 82.9% | 79.6% |
On this, Claude 4 typically excels in coding, GPT-4o in reasoning, and Gemini 2.5 Professional gives sturdy, balanced efficiency throughout totally different modalities. For extra info, please go to right here.
Total Evaluation
Right here’s what we’ve discovered about these superior closing fashions, based mostly on the above factors of comparability:
- We discovered that Claude 4 excels in coding, math, and gear use, however it’s also the costliest one.
- GPT-4o excels at reasoning and multimodal help, dealing with totally different enter codecs, making it a super selection for extra superior and sophisticated assistants.
- In the meantime, Gemini 2.5 Professional gives a robust and balanced efficiency with the biggest context window and essentially the most cost-effective pricing.
Claude 4 vs GPT-4o vs Gemini 2.5 Professional: Coding Capabilities
Now we’ll examine the code-writing capabilities of Claude 4, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.5 Professional. For that, we’re going to give the identical immediate to all three fashions and consider their responses on the next metrics:
- Effectivity
- Readability
- Remark and Documentation
- Error Dealing with
Process 1: Design Taking part in Playing cards with HTML, CSS, and JS
Immediate: “Create an interactive webpage that shows a set of WWE Celebrity flashcards utilizing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Every card ought to symbolize a WWE wrestler, and should embody a back and front aspect. On the entrance, show the wrestler’s identify and picture. On the again, present further stats resembling their ending transfer, model, and championship titles. The flashcards ought to have a flip animation when hovered over or clicked.
Moreover, add interactive controls to make the web page dynamic: a button that shuffles the playing cards, and one other that reveals a random card from the deck. The structure must be visually interesting and responsive for various display screen sizes. Bonus factors in the event you embody sound results like entrance music when a card is flipped.
Key Options to Implement:
- Entrance of card: wrestler’s identify + picture
- Again of card: stats (e.g., finisher, model, titles)
- Flip animation utilizing CSS or JS
- “Shuffle” button to randomly reorder playing cards
- “Present Random Celebrity” button
- Responsive design.”
Claude 4’s Response:
GPT-4o’s Response:
Gemini 2.5 Professional’s Response:
Comparative Evaluation
Within the first job, Claude 4 gave essentially the most interactive expertise with essentially the most dynamic visuals. It additionally added a sound impact whereas clicking on the cardboard. GPT-4o gave a black theme structure with clean transitions and absolutely practical buttons, however lacked the audio performance. In the meantime, Gemini 2.5 Professional gave the best and most elementary sequential structure with no animation or sound. Additionally, the random card characteristic on this one failed to point out the cardboard’s face correctly. Total, Claude takes the lead right here, adopted by GPT-4o, after which Gemini.
Process 2: Construct a Recreation
Immediate: “Spell Technique Recreation is a turn-based battle sport constructed with Pygame, the place two mages compete by casting spells from their spellbooks. Every participant begins with 100 HP and 100 Mana and takes turns choosing spells that deal harm, heal, or apply particular results like shields and stuns. Spells devour mana and have cooldown durations, requiring gamers to handle assets and strategize fastidiously. The sport options an enticing UI with well being and mana bars, and spell cooldown indicators.. Gamers can face off in opposition to one other human or an AI opponent, aiming to scale back their rival’s HP to zero via tactical choices.
Key Options:
- Flip-based gameplay with two mages (PvP or PvAI)
- 100 HP and 100 Mana per participant
- Spellbook with various spells: harm, therapeutic, shields, stuns, mana recharge
- Mana prices and cooldowns for every spell to encourage strategic play
- Visible UI parts: well being/mana bars, cooldown indicators, spell icons
- AI opponent with easy tactical decision-making
- Mouse-driven controls with non-compulsory keyboard shortcuts
- Clear in-game messaging exhibiting actions and results”
Claude 4’s Response:
GPT-4o’s Response:
Gemini 2.5 Professional’s Response:
Comparative Evaluation
Within the second job, on the entire, not one of the fashions supplied correct graphics. Every one displayed a black display screen with a minimal interface. Nevertheless, Claude 4 supplied essentially the most practical and clean management over the sport, with a variety of assault, defence, and different strategic gameplay. GPT-4o, then again, suffered from efficiency points, resembling lagging, and a small and concise window measurement. Even Gemini 2.5 Professional fell brief right here, as its code didn’t run and gave some errors. Total, as soon as once more, Claude takes the lead right here, adopted by GPT-4o, after which Gemini 2.5 Professional.
Process 3: Finest Time to Purchase and Promote Inventory
Immediate: “You’re given an array costs the place costs[i] is the value of a given inventory on the ith day.
Discover the utmost revenue you possibly can obtain. You might full at most two transactions.
Notice: You might not have interaction in a number of transactions concurrently (i.e., it’s essential to promote the inventory before you purchase once more).
Instance:
Enter: costs = [3,3,5,0,0,3,1,4]
Output: 6
Rationalization: Purchase on day 4 (value = 0) and promote on day 6 (value = 3), revenue = 3-0 = 3. Then purchase on day 7 (value = 1) and promote on day 8 (value = 4), revenue = 4-1 = 3.”
Claude 4’s Response:
GPT-4o’s Response:
Gemini 2.5 Professional’s Response:
Comparative Evaluation
Within the third and closing job, the fashions needed to clear up the issue utilizing dynamic programming. Among the three, GPT-4o provideed essentially the most sensible and well-approached answer, utilizing a clear 2D dynamic programming with protected initialization, and likewise embodyd check circumstances. Whereas Claude 4 presentd a extra detailed and academic method, it’s extra verbose. In the meantime, Gemini 2.5 Professional gave a concise technique, however used INT_MIN initialization, which is a dangerous method. So on this job, GPT-4o takes the lead, adopted by Claude 4, after which Gemini 2.5 Professional.
Last Verdict: Total Evaluation
Right here’s a comparative abstract of how nicely every mannequin has carried out within the above duties.
| Process | Claude 4 | GPT-4o | Gemini 2.5 Professional | Winner |
| Process 1 (Card UI) | Most interactive with animations and sound results | Clean darkish theme with practical buttons, no audio | Fundamental sequential structure, card face situation, no animation/sound | Claude 4 |
| Process 2 (Recreation Management) | Clean controls, broad technique choices, most practical sport | Usable however laggy, small window | Didn’t run, interface errors | Claude 4 |
| Process 3 (Dynamic Programming) | Verbose however instructional, good for studying | Clear and protected DP answer with check circumstances, most sensible | Concise however unsafe (makes use of INT_MIN), lacks robustness | GPT-4o |
To examine the entire model of all of the code information, please go to right here.
Conclusion
Now, via this complete comparability of three various duties, we now have noticed that Claude 4 stands out with its interactive UI design capabilities and secure logic in modular programming, making it the highest performer general. Whereas GPT-4o follows intently with its clear and sensible coding, and excels in algorithmic downside fixing. In the meantime, Gemini 2.5 Professional lacks in UI design and stability in execution throughout all duties. However these observations are utterly based mostly on the above comparability, whereas every mannequin has distinctive strengths, and the selection of mannequin utterly relies on the issue we are attempting to unravel.
Whats up! I am Vipin, a passionate knowledge science and machine studying fanatic with a robust basis in knowledge evaluation, machine studying algorithms, and programming. I’ve hands-on expertise in constructing fashions, managing messy knowledge, and fixing real-world issues. My objective is to use data-driven insights to create sensible options that drive outcomes. I am desperate to contribute my expertise in a collaborative surroundings whereas persevering with to be taught and develop within the fields of Information Science, Machine Studying, and NLP.
Login to proceed studying and revel in expert-curated content material.